Wednesday, September 12, 2012

Comparison of the Benefits of Distance Education

Comparison of the Benefits of Distance Education


Michael Simonson (2008) defines distance education as a type of formal education that occurs when resources, students, and teachers are separated by geography and occasionally by time. Simonson believes there is a need to evolve distance education into the next generation because not only has distance education been around for centuries, but also “It doesn’t take a soothsayer to look into the future and say, distance education is going to increase dramatically in the next few years, in the next few decades (Simonson, 2008)”. Simonson (2008) also believes that distance education is starting to be “expected and respected.”

Moller, Forshay, and Huett (2008) believe that colleges perceive distance education as an opportunity to sustain student enrollment. However, Moller, Forshay, and Huett (2008) also state that K-12 online programs lack the quality to be equivalent to that of a traditional K-12 program. Moller, Forshay, and Huett seem to agree with Simonson regarding the inevitability of distance education becoming more popular; however, Moller, Forshay, and Huett seem to believe that it may ultimately not be more beneficial for students than traditional education.

I agree with Moller, Forshay, and Huett regarding their viewpoint of distance education. I believe the value of an education can be diminished more easily through distance education because many students are not honest. In a traditional classroom, teachers can monitor students. That element in relinquished in distance education. However, the students who maintain a level of respect and honesty have the opportunity to benefit equally from distance education. 

References

Huett, J., Moller, L., Foshay, W. R., & Coleman, C. (2008). The Evolution of Distance Education:            Implications for Instructional Design on the Potential of the Web. Techtrends: Linking Research & Practice To Improve Learning, 52(5), 63-67. doi:10.1007/s11528-008-0199-9
Laureate Education, Inc. (2008). Principles of Distance Education. Baltimore, MD: Simonson, Michael.
Moller, L., Foshay, W. R., & Huett, J. (2008). The Evolution of Distance Education: Implications for Instructional Design on the Potential of the Web. Techtrends: Linking Research & Practice To   Improve Learning, 52(4), 66-70. doi:10.1007/s11528-008-0179-0

7 comments:

  1. John,
    This is a great topic due to our current involvement in online education. I agree with the point that institutions are implementing more and more online courses to sustain student enrollment. My "brick and mortar" college is facing the same challenges, losing students to online universities. Do you think it is the faculty's responsibility to keep students honest, or should this be a college-wide responsibility?
    Best,
    Marc

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Marc,
    I believe that online courses should require a monitored final exam. This could be conducted by paid test facilitators, in a similar fashion to summer ACT/SAT courses for high school students. This would help protect accreditation of universities as they expand into the practice of distance education.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Nice post. Distance education is effective.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hello John,

    I do not know much about K-12 online course development. I am surprised that 'monitoring' is not available on the back end of the courses. I think I thought that the younger the student the more supervision would be required and the stricter the rrequirements for interaction and attendance. If my at my job they can 'know' what webpages I am on and how many keystrokes I have used then I am pretty sure it could be the same for the courses.

    ReplyDelete
  6. The question of honesty is one that may never be solved. This si true in all types of classrooms. I am not sure that I agree that this lack of honesty will keep the distance learning experience from being equal to face to face. Those students that are dishonest with themselves are the same in regular classrooms.
    Debbie Stripling

    ReplyDelete
  7. I liked to hear you talk about the topic. Yours is the first one I have viewed that actually has you primarily. You are providing the information about your topic with your footage of actual students that encounter the issues you are addressing. I think this is what the assignment is supposed to have been. You talking about what you have learned, your topic and how it applies to what we learned in this course, and it works. Thank you for presenting a video that is not all about the fancy technology tools and more about the content. I was not sure what the video was supposed to be, so mine is not anything like yours.

    ReplyDelete